maxxis forekaster vs ardent

Forekaster are great all around tires, Adrdents are still ok tires IMO but honestly since riding 2.35 Forekaster and 2.4 Rekons I cant ever see riding an arent again either. NZD, The Aspen has some small race size ramped knobs in the center with larger more aggressive side knobs. GBP Sign up to receive Bikerumor content direct to your inbox. The side nobs are not as aggressive as those on the Ardent. The Ardent has been part of the Maxxis lineup for years. The intermediate zone, between upright and full leant over, is a little vague the knobs in this space are sparse and fairly flexible. FEATURES OF THE NEW MAXXIS FOREKASTER INCLUDE: The new Forekaster slots into the Maxxis mountain line between our XC options that prioritize rolling speed (Aspen, Rekon Race, Ikon, Rekon) and our gravity-focused treads (Dissector, Minion DHF, Minion DHR, Assegai) which emphasize cornering and braking traction. For now, it seems the tires will be offered in 29 only, and have claimed weights of 945g for the 2.4 and 1035g for the 2.6. Maxxis Forekaster Tire - Review - Pinkbike We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. Its got a lot of float and drift potential, and very little rolling resistance for added speed. I have a buddy that runs the Forkaster front & rear on his Primer raves about them. Ill be after these as soon as theyre available. Its also available in a 2.4 which wed consider as a great front tyre option for looser or sandier conditions; 2.25 out back, 2.4 up front = aggressive trail riding perfection. While the Maxxis DHRII comes in a vast array of widths, casings and rubber options, the only ones to look at here are the 2.3 and 2.4 widths with EXO protection. Grippy compound. The new Forekaster has morphed into something new, and while it may no longer really be an XC tire, it's now an excellent all-round trail tire. Well look at where the Ardent stands out, where it falls a little short, and the differences between front and rear mounting this tire. With riders from Nino Schurter winning many races on this tire to the more adventure marathon riders like Geoff Kabush also riding this tire for a wide range of events, it shows its speed with results alone. They seemed like a decent tyre for my needs, especially for the weight but I miss the 3C compound on my newer pair. I love the Ikons but I really need something on the front with more bite. I wouldn't run it on the front no matter what. https://www.dirtmerchantbikes.com/snorthwest-summer-2015-xc-tire-comparison-test. The forekaster has surprisingly good grip for it's weight, and it performs well in a wide range of conditions (dry loose over hard all the way to slightly greasy clay) but it is no doubt, a reduced rolling resistance xc/trail tire. The grip afforded by the Trail Kings got better with a bit of trail time, the tyres losing their coating and the knobs becoming more pliable (but still supportive). A forum is a difficult place to get helpful information on tires. While I wouldn't consider myself a weight weenie, I do look at the weight on tires and wheels. 3C is a good addition but I really dont want a tyre just shy of 1kg for my riding. They sure looked the part for a do all tire in the Pacific North Wet (yes wet) with their well-spaced ramped center tread and transition nobs. Something to sit between the Aspen/Ikon/Ardent and the Assegai/Minion/Dissector. Thats not a huge surprise since Maxxis is well known for producing high quality and durable tire sets. Use code HELLO54 when you join us as a print or digital member and your membership will be half price for the first year. The 29er version with the durable DoubleDown casing we tested weighed 1,090 grams. In this review, our customer Jordan goes with the Ardent in front and Forekaster in the rear. This new Forekaster looks almost identical to the newer Nic, just with the trademark Maxxis ramped centre tread. Tested: Four great trail bike treads - Flow Mountain Bike Maxxis Dissector. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. VerticalScope Inc., 111 Peter Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. Thick branches can be a similar problem if your tire hits them pointy-end first. Unlike some of their more aggressive trail tires, the Aggressor has a more moderate center tread profile, which is a nice middle ground between the super aggressive and the semi-slick options. . Id also love to know this. I will grant you though that a .25 inch difference on an Ikon on the same rim made a noticeable difference in volume and pressure I could roll with, and I'm guessing that imparts improvements, so I've considered going to a 2.4. I know the 2.25 on my 29er and the 2.4 WT on my 27.5 measured out the same, and the 27.5 was on a rim that was 7mm wider internally. I never think about the Forekaster which means it works. Maxxis Forekaster vs Ardent Like the Ardent, the Forekaster is tubless ready. This tire handled a mix of hardpack, medium, and loose over hard no problem. I have the now older version and quite happy with it. That center tread is fantastic for good rolling resistance. Hi, after a decade of riding a 2007 Giant Trance, I've finally upgraded my bike to a Merida One Twenty XT with 29" wheels. Still feels like it rolls pretty good even mounted reversed. Contis Black Chili compound seems to improve with use. Bontrager have really hit the mark with the XR4 tyres for all round aggressive trail use. Both 2.35 on 27mm IW rims. Maxxis Ardent, Bontrager XR4, Continental Trail King and Schwalbe Hans Dampf. They work great for getting loose when you want to. @honourablegeorge I reckon it would be Dissector up front, no? This year, Alberto Contador & Ivan Basso race off-road with the all-new Manto carbon gravel bike, the highest performance bike on the market, Peppermint Cycling Co. just announced its spring line a collection that includes new pieces across MTB, gravel, and road disciplines. Its no weight weenie xc tire but it does roll much better than either of the Maxxis Minions. EUR Regardless. I couldn't fault it at. The outgoing model was already a great downcountry tire. However, the tires are again similar in that they tend to have less grip and slip a little more on very loose terrain types. You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Maxxis Ardent / Forekaster - Which one front & rear? Both are also tubeless-ready, or TR, so you have the additional option depending on how youd prefer to ride. The result is a tire that blends low rolling resistance . With more intermediate knobs than the Ardent tire, the Ardent Race looks more like an aggressive Ikon tire. In fact, the Forekaster is going right back on (as a rear) for the summer. For similar rolling speed with improved braking and cornering performance, check out the Rekon. Schwalbe Magic Mary Purple Addix front. That brand reputation should definitely be considered when youre looking for a great tire since it comes with better assurances that the tire has actually been built to do what it says it can do. FWIW, Im a big fan of the DHF up front. The Forekaster is also slightly more prone to drifting, especially mounted as the rear tire, or with a cyclist who tends to use the rear brake heavily.

Ethnic Island Ap Human Geography, Social Responsibility In A Christmas Carol Quotes, How Much Does A Medevac Helicopter Cost, Kiyan Anthony Ranking, Articles M